So I'm looking for a new camera soon. I don't need anything outrageous, just something to take photos at concerts, with friends and what not. I was wondering which would be the best price wise from Nikon:
To be honest? I think the average camera is like the average computer people usually get...
Way beyond their needs.
People get quad core processors to send an email and surf the web... and 90 gazillion megapixel cameras to show rover sniffing his nuts.
Just try not to go too nuts over the price. Hell, even a 4 megapixel should do you fine. You shouldn't be spending more than a little over 100 bucks. If there are features you really want, look them over and think them over, but really. Keep in perspective that you're taking fun pics.
If you really plan to learn photography, really get into it artistically? Well... then you might justify putting some bucks into it, and the time to research options, what you need and the fundamentals of the art is NOW. Before you buy a camera.
-- OMG! That would have been so funny if that was funny!
To be honest? I think the average camera is like the average computer people usually get...
Way beyond their needs.
People get quad core processors to send an email and surf the web... and 90 gazillion megapixel cameras to show rover sniffing his nuts.
Just try not to go too nuts over the price. Hell, even a 4 megapixel should do you fine. You shouldn't be spending more than a little over 100 bucks. If there are features you really want, look them over and think them over, but really. Keep in perspective that you're taking fun pics.
If you really plan to learn photography, really get into it artistically? Well... then you might justify putting some bucks into it, and the time to research options, what you need and the fundamentals of the art is NOW. Before you buy a camera.
I dabble in photography. I took a class in high school and really enjoyed it but wouldn't pursue it past a hobby. So I think a camera a little above average would do me fine. I wouldn't want to spend any more than $250 anyway.
I read a long article how more megapixels do NOT equal better image quality. I wish I could dig it up.
It has relation to how large a print size you can go for later and retain sharpness, so I can see a graphic designer or photographer looking to do poster prints etc. later, but I don't get the impression you are going to be doing all this sort of stuff, doing advertisements and the like.
As a general rule of thumb, I get serious and spend money in things where I am serious. I may put a lot of money into a computer because I will use it. I play games and some games are pretty hard hitting. Knives I take camping. They have to be good quality so I can cut rope, open things, resist elements and I don't have to sharpen every 5 minutes.
Camera? Fuck it. Use it primarily for illustration in gunsmithing tutorials. Don't need anything fancy, I get a cheapie. The 300 bucks I save can be applied to gunsmithing tools or a computer upgrade later rather than wasted on features I'm not going to use. That would be illogical. I'm not out to impress. I just need to get the job done.
-- OMG! That would have been so funny if that was funny!
It has relation to how large a print size you can go for later and retain sharpness, so I can see a graphic designer or photographer looking to do poster prints etc. later, but I don't get the impression you are going to be doing all this sort of stuff, doing advertisements and the like.
As a general rule of thumb, I get serious and spend money in things where I am serious. I may put a lot of money into a computer because I will use it. I play games and some games are pretty hard hitting. Knives I take camping. They have to be good quality so I can cut rope, open things, resist elements and I don't have to sharpen every 5 minutes.
Camera? Fuck it. Use it primarily for illustration in gunsmithing tutorials. Don't need anything fancy, I get a cheapie. The 300 bucks I save can be applied to gunsmithing tools or a computer upgrade later rather than wasted on features I'm not going to use. That would be illogical. I'm not out to impress. I just need to get the job done.
Most of my money goes to guitar stuff and computer/audio equipment.
I'd rather spend a little more money at the time and get good quality to make a camera last. But the last thing I would want is to bring it to a show only to have sub-decent pictures to share.
I paid about $205 for it, but that was about 2 years ago. It's pretty broken now. My memory card doesn't work in it anymore because I've dropped it so many times so it can only hold like 77 photos. And it switches between video and camera all the time. Buy one a new one pretty baby?
-- Andy: So, they decriminalized pot in massachusetts
Andy: just thought you'd like to know
Andy: pothead!